with the included randomized design. Various arrangements
are possible; the plots may be placed between blocks or
between treated plots within blocks (Fig. 9).
Excluded controls
: control plots are selected outside the
trial area and not adjacent to it, in an area with conditions
closely similar to those of the trial. Replication is not
essential but may be useful if the area is not homogeneous.
The
observations
made
in
these
plots
should
not
be
included in the statistical analysis.
Adjacent controls
: each plot is divided equally into 2
subplots, and one of these (at random) is left untreated.
Observations are made in the same way in both sub-plots.
The
observations
made
in
these
plots
should
not
be
included in the statistical analysis unless due allowance is
taken of the fact that the design is a form of split-plot. In a
split-plot design, the variability within plots may differ
from that between plots; consequently the analysis of vari-
ance should include 2 strata of error. Specialist statistical
advice may be necessary to interpret the results.
1.6.3 Choice of the type of arrangement of untreated con-
trol
The choice of the arrangement of the untreated control
depends on its role(s) in the trial. Although the included
control has very often been used in the past in efficacy
evaluation trials, and is still frequently used in practice, it
is not necessarily the most suitable. The following decision
scheme gives guidance.
(a) If the control is used in a statistical test, then the
‘included control’ is essential. If not, another type of
control can be used. In either case the heterogeneity of
the plots should be considered;
(b) If heterogeneity is high, the ‘adjacent control’ is suit-
able. If heterogeneity is low or moderate, the interfer-
ence of the control plots with the adjacent plots should
then be considered;
(c) If the control plots are not liable to interfere with adja-
cent plots, then the ‘imbricated control’ is suitable;
(d) If control plots are liable to interfere with adjacent
plots, then the ‘excluded control’ should be used.
1.7 Selection of the sample size in a plot
The main purpose of taking several samples inside a plot is
to reduce the variability of the estimated plot mean to a
suitable level for the assessed variable. The sample size
should be large enough to achieve this purpose. The sample
size required depends greatly on the nature of the observa-
tion and the variability within the plot. EPPO standards on
the assessment of specific pests, weeds and diseases give
advice on sample sizes. In practice, sample sizes of 10
–
50
elements are usually enough to accomplish the goal of cor-
rect estimation of the mean value in a plot, depending on
the inherent variability. Note that, if the treatments are
applied to plots, then increasing the sample size within
plots
only
gives
a
strictly
limited
return
of
efficiency,
because between-treatment comparisons should be made at
between-plot scale.
Sampling
should
always
be
random
and
should
ade-
quately cover the area of the plot and the experimental
untreated area;
control plot (area under observation)
Block 1
Block 2
Block 3
1
2
3
4
3
1
4
2
4
3
2
1
2
4
1
3
Block 1
Block 2
Block 3
Block 4
Block 1
3
4
3
1
4
2
Block 2
Block 3
4
2
1
3
2
1
2
4
1
3
Block 4
3
2
1
4
3
1
4
2
4
3
2
1
2
4
1
3
Block 4
Fig. 9
An example of the use of imbricated control plots for a randomized block trial with 4 blocks and 4 treatments.
Design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials
373
ª
2012 OEPP/EPPO,
Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin
42
, 367–381